tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-52310687993387853212024-03-08T22:22:22.180+00:00Joe CouperA blog about all things music from music industry professional Joe Couper. Album reviews, technology reviews, tutorials and opinion galore!JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.comBlogger24125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-45927638233058840792010-07-21T00:59:00.001+01:002010-07-21T01:01:53.741+01:00Latitude 2010<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TEY3IRMiTQI/AAAAAAAAAI0/2lWCGD_F86w/s1600/7.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TEY3IRMiTQI/AAAAAAAAAI0/2lWCGD_F86w/s320/7.jpg" /></a></div>I took a break this weekend to go to Latitude, the first time I've watched live music for fun in about a year. Latitude is held at Henham Park in Southwald, Suffolk making it my local festival. I went a couple of years back but it was bigger this year, bigger acts and more people. The toilets were also noticeably better as was the wrist banding procedure. It was generally better organized although there were a few unfortunate clashes that could have been avoided.<br />
Latitude refers to itself with the tag line "more than just a music festival" in sufferance to its arty nature. There are stages for theatre, literature, poetry, cabaret, dance and comedy and you could easily spend the whole weekend not seeing any music; you'd be an idiot though because the music was superb. I won't go into any real depth of the other stages but I'll say that I did watch some theatre, listen to some book readings and watch some stand up. There are people that spend the whole weekend in the comedy tent; the line-up really was great this year. Robin Ince's book club was pretty entertaining as well this year, a departure from the last time I saw him. The book club mainly focused on a series of books by <a href="http://www.guynsmith.com/">Guy N. Smith</a> that all focus on giant killer crabs invading the English coast, a topic he explores in more detain in his <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Robin-Inces-Bad-Book-Club/dp/1847442692">new book</a> which I'll have to pick up some time.<br />
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TEY2jifzaNI/AAAAAAAAAIs/APxsuYtH0dw/s1600/6.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TEY2jifzaNI/AAAAAAAAAIs/APxsuYtH0dw/s320/6.jpg" /></a>I'll give a quick rundown of some of the acts that blew my socks off. Firstly Wild Beasts were just amazing. The few technical issues aside they were one of the best sounding bands at the festival and a band that brings a lot of energy to their show, more so than their record which I love. Laura Marling was similar, her voice is breath taking, something you don't fully realize from listening to her recordings. Spoon brought a kind of energy that you rarely hear and were much more raw than I was expecting. I can’t in all good conscience say that Empire Of The Sun were good, but I enjoyed them. It was the most visually striking show I saw, but it was mostly backing track. There were four dancers and very elaborate costumes to the point of silliness, many times there were only dancers on stage dancing to a backing track at which point I saw a lot of people leave and a lot of people either pissed off or laughing at the pompousness of it all. It was entertaining though and I'm still a big fan. I had no interest in watching Florence and the Machine as I saw her last year and frankly she was terrible. I don't know if she was having a bad day, or was saving herself for some of the bigger shows but she killed the atmosphere at last years Camp Bestival. Instead I opted to watch The National, a band I know very little about other than that I loved their new album. As it happens they were brilliant, and got one of the best crowd reactions I saw at the festival.<br />
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TEY2djS-E9I/AAAAAAAAAIM/_HmPU5XmGhw/s1600/2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TEY2djS-E9I/AAAAAAAAAIM/_HmPU5XmGhw/s320/2.jpg" width="240" /></a>On Saturday I spent most of my time watching stuff that wasn't music. The only bands I saw were Frightened Rabbit and Belle and Sebastian. Frightened Rabbit are one of my favourite acts at the moment and they didn't disappoint. They sounded great mix wise and the crowd loved them. Belle and Sebastian are a band that I really don't know very much of at all except their bigger hits. They played a set that showed how much they have changed throughout their career and made it feel like a coherent set. They have the luxury of having such a vast library of music that every song they played was brilliantly written and arranged. They were the only main stage headliner I watched all weekend so I can't really compare it, but the crowd adored them and hung on their every word in a way you very rarely see.<br />
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TEY2gcBqXdI/AAAAAAAAAIc/jHXuIa3SryM/s1600/4.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="179" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TEY2gcBqXdI/AAAAAAAAAIc/jHXuIa3SryM/s320/4.jpg" width="320" /></a>Sunday had the strongest line up of any day. As a result in fact I got sunburned to hell from standing outside too long. The night before Tom Jones announced he was playing a second set, this time main stage at midday. I was pleased because I was eager to see him for some reason and I couldn't get to the stage he was playing at in the woods due to all the crowds. He played his new album of blues and gospel covers, which was actually pretty good. His band was great and is voice is just as powerful as you would expect. People kept shouting for him to play his hits, most notably sex-bomb and I'm glad he didn't because what we got was a heartfelt performance of music that Tom clearly loves, free of the kind of trashy cheese he has become famous for. It was genuinely moving. Shortly after I saw Mumford and Sons, a band I don't care for, but they did a great performance and they sounded much better than their recordings. They were followed by Dirty Projectors who cleared a lot of Jones' fans out but treated the remaining fans to a great set. I then ran over to see Yeasayer, who I adore. They sounded great and it was good to hear mostly electronic music played well after the disappointing lack of live playing from Empire of the Sun earlier that weekend. It surprised me how big of a crowd they had drawn but they deserved it. Annoyingly I had to miss Vampire Weekend in order to see two of my favourite bands from the last few years. I really would have liked to have seen them and hopefully I will soon, they looked amazing on the Glastonbury highlights and I only heard good things about them at Latitude. Instead I went to watch Jonsi, who brought new life into an album that I have become sick of. It's interesting seeing Jonsi play solo after watching him with Sigur Ros a couple of years back. Its the mark of a great performer that he is equally as comfortable playing main stage with a band with numbers into double figures, playing epic post rock as he is playing in a tent in a four piece band playing more typical pop songs. The final band I saw was Grizzly Bear, one of my favourite bands, but also a band that looked pretty poor on the Glastonbury highlights. I wasn't sure how wise it was to watch a band that I love on record that might not live up to it and potentially kill my interest in a band that is one of the most interesting around. Thankfully they were mindblowingly good, they sounded amazing, they performed as good and as tight as they do in their recordings, and the crowd adored them just as much as I did.<br />
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TEY2fcGyZBI/AAAAAAAAAIU/Gy3-zeRU3gs/s1600/3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TEY2fcGyZBI/AAAAAAAAAIU/Gy3-zeRU3gs/s320/3.jpg" /></a>I've got to say that all in all the Word arena (the second stage) was a far more pleasant place to be than the Obelisk arena (main stage). It sounded more consistently good and it had a far better atmosphere. I remember thinking something similar last time I came, but there were less issues getting in to the tent this year for whatever reason.<br />
On a less pleasant note, you might have heard that there were two rapes over the weekend, a sad issue that could have been avoided with more of a police presence. I only saw one officer all weekend, even after the first rape. I also heard reports of violent behaviour and fires in the yellow camp site (Helen and I slept in the quiet site and had no such problems), which is pretty unacceptable seeing as events like Latitude, pay the police for their services. The people in charge of police numbers and key areas should really be ashamed, I don't know what they could have done but then I'm not paid to know either. I would also say that after two rapes, I had still only heard about them from Twitter and texts from family and friends. I've gotta say that I find it very irresponsible of Latitude and the police to not tell people to adjust their behaviour, both of the women raped were on their own, if the second had have known maybe she wouldn't have been alone and maybe her neighbours would have been more observant.<br />
If you want to listen to any of the music from latitude Absolute radio is hosting some of it to listen to <a href="http://www.absoluteradio.co.uk/music/live/latitude/">here</a>. I've made a Spotify playlist of all the bands I loved and you can listen to it <a href="http://bit.ly/cD0BJr">here</a><br />
<br />
<br />
All pictures courtesy of <a href="http://hwkwright.blogspot.com/">Helen Wright</a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TEY2cdy0vLI/AAAAAAAAAIE/iER8YFZDeRc/s1600/1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TEY2cdy0vLI/AAAAAAAAAIE/iER8YFZDeRc/s320/1.jpg" /></a><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TEY2i9BC0II/AAAAAAAAAIk/-N8-K0P5uJM/s1600/5.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TEY2i9BC0II/AAAAAAAAAIk/-N8-K0P5uJM/s320/5.jpg" /></a></div>JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-61810284151484182692010-07-10T18:36:00.000+01:002010-07-10T18:36:39.823+01:00Digg is changing<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TDijLK1IqYI/AAAAAAAAAHs/G7E7sMTYskQ/s1600/digg3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="170" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TDijLK1IqYI/AAAAAAAAAHs/G7E7sMTYskQ/s320/digg3.jpg" width="320" /></a>I'm a long time <a href="http://digg.com/users/j035u5">Digg user</a> and I'd have to say its one of the sites I use most often. There is no better news aggregation site to find new articles and discus them (in my opinion). For those that don't know, Digg is a website where links are submitted and voted on by the users, the highest rated of which appear on the front page which everyone sees. Just recently Digg has released an alpha version of the revamp they have planned for the site at <a href="http://new.digg.com/">new.digg.com</a>, dubbed Digg 4. I'm going to quickly go through a few of the changes.<br />
Firstly, the most obvious change is a cosmetic one. Everything looks a lot cleaner, theres a lot less green and a lot more white. You could say it looks more like Facebook. The older site is on the left, the newer on the right.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TDiiwlJ1HVI/AAAAAAAAAHk/wngyOH1ndIY/s1600/digg4.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/TDiiwlJ1HVI/AAAAAAAAAHk/wngyOH1ndIY/s320/digg4.jpg" /></a><br />
Overall I'd say I much prefer the new look. There's a lot less ads too, although I'm not sure how long that will be true for.<br />
The next big obvious change is in the fundamental way the front page ranking system works. When you open up Digg 4 you are greeted by the all new My News section. My News has more in common with Facebook or Twitter than the old style Digg, it shows stories that your friends have dug up or submitted rather than the general consensus of the world, the idea of which is to expand Digg's user base beyond that of tech and media pros, and general geeky stuff. if you only subscribe to your friends, or at least people who share similar interests to you, you needn't ever see another tech story again. To me at this moment in time this feature is largely useless, as most of my friends don't use Digg, there are a lot of content providers who I've subscribed to and this provides an easy way to see them.<br />
There is still the Top News section, which works largely the same as the old style Digg, although I did notice that I get completely different stories in each feed. I personally bookmarked the Top News section as this is where I spend most of my time.<br />
Another thing which has been streamlined is the submission system. content creators can now add an RSS feed of their content, each new item being automatically added and shared in the My News section. I'll be honest, I always thought submitting your own content was kind of cheating and that it ruins the organic nature of the site, but I've added my feed and I'll see if it gets me anywhere.<br />
Digg has also put a big submission box right at the top of the page to encourage new content to be submitted.<br />
Digg is clearly trying to position itself as a more social site, but also as a potential replacement for an RSS reader. I personally would much rather use Digg than a reader with social functions like Google Reader, but the content owners have to make their content available first.<br />
Finally, Digg has added vanity URLs similar to Twitter and Facebook, so that your profile can now be located at new.digg.com/your user name, a feature that is made all the more useful given Digg's new social focus. Incidentally, if anyone is interested in following me on Digg 4, my profile is <a href="http://new.digg.com/j035u5">here</a>.<br />
All in all, I am overwhelmingly pleased pleased with the new Digg, I just hope that content creators get on board. I cant see myself replacing my RSS reader of choice just yet, but I do like the idea of doing so.JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-33645632455404621582010-07-09T14:36:00.001+01:002010-07-10T17:20:31.081+01:00BT TalkTalk and the Digital Economy BillI'll start off by stating my position on the Digital Economy Bill, or at lest part of it pertaining to music copyright. I'm have a pretty moderate stance on piracy, I don't do it, I don't think people should do it, but I understand that people who can't afford music will do it, and that it doesn't have an entirely negative effect on the music industry.<br />
Sure it's changed the recording industry (although thats not the only reason the recording industry has changed), but there are a lot of bands that couldn't have made it to where they are today without the immediacy of the Internet, and the publicity that can generate from a band who's music is being heard everywhere. I'm also a strong believer that the record industry fucked up, and thats why their profits are plummeting. They have lost all of the trust that they once had, and lots of music fans don't want to give their money to the kind of businesses that sue children for millions of pounds for downloading a song for free from the Internet.<br />
Do I wish that piracy was a non- issue again? Sure! There would be an awful lot more money changing hands in the music industry, maybe I'd get more of it, but you cant put that genie back in the bottle, file-sharing is the norm, and any successful music business understands that.<br />
The real problem I have with the digital economy bill is that it puts the power to judge people guilty of file-sharing in the hands of the content holders. There should never be a point where anyone but the courts and the police should be the people in charge of judging when someone is in breach of the law, thats lunacy. They're not trained, they're free of bias and they hold no authority.<br />
So when I heard yesterday that BT and TalkTalk broadband <a href="http://www.musicweek.com/story.asp?storycode=1041779">want a judicial review</a> of the DEC, that gives them more power in warning persistent file-sharers and eventually cutting them off, it made me mad. It made me mad because they are in no better stead to judge whether someone is innocent or guilty than the copyright holders themselves. Cutting off file-sharers would benefit them greatly, because without people using bandwidth heavy services like file-sharing, they need not update their struggling systems so fast.<br />
What we need, is a system where the content holders contact the authorities, who investigate the matter and if it is deemed that the person accused is in fact guilty, then they get punished in whatever way is deemed fit (not disconnection, maybe suspension, bandwidth caps and fines though) AND that they are given a means to appeal this judgment (such as, my wifi was open).<br />
So I say that if BT and TalkTalk want more power to cut people off, rather than suggesting that the courts take care of it, I will not use either of them ever again. We'll have to see what comes of it.JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-25495778962559104162010-07-09T02:34:00.000+01:002010-07-09T02:34:04.856+01:00coming this weekA review of the new Digg.<br />
A discussion on the digital economy act, and why you should boycott BT and TalkTalk.<br />
<br />
Sorry its been so long, and sorry this is so brief. Oh and by the way, for those of you who don't know, I graduated with a first class honours the other day!<br />
<br />
And for Digg : 6f5afc26b8bf4a0fb6cf6d3103c2b2a4<br />
Thats a verification key for any human beings out there, I'll write about it when I review the new Digg updatesJCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-79558099286592652832010-06-09T17:48:00.000+01:002010-06-09T17:48:44.458+01:00For those that are interestedHere is my disssertation! Feel free to read through it and share it around if you feel like it. Bear in mind that it isn't the most easy piece of text to read, Bucks has pretty strict guidelines about the format and the content of its dissertations so it might not be laid out in the most logical way.<br />
The goal of the dissertation for me was to talk to as many interesting people as possible and it turned out pretty well, I learned a lot about digital consoles, particuarly about their weaknesses and strengths.<br />
<br />
<a title="View How might operational use of live digital consoles be improved? A Dissertation on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/30504685/How-might-operational-use-of-live-digital-consoles-be-improved-A-Dissertation" style="margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block; text-decoration: underline;">How might operational use of live digital consoles be improved? A Dissertation</a> <object id="doc_289634643059048" name="doc_289634643059048" height="500" width="100%" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" style="outline:none;" rel="media:document" resource="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=30504685&access_key=key-20rw1dj5wltxncyjyn8o&page=1&viewMode=list" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/searchmonkey/media/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" > <param name="movie" value="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf"><param name="wmode" value="opaque"><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><param name="FlashVars" value="document_id=30504685&access_key=key-20rw1dj5wltxncyjyn8o&page=1&viewMode=list"><embed id="doc_289634643059048" name="doc_289634643059048" src="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=30504685&access_key=key-20rw1dj5wltxncyjyn8o&page=1&viewMode=list" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="500" width="100%" wmode="opaque" bgcolor="#ffffff"></embed> </object>JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-75632989105990099702010-05-26T21:01:00.001+01:002010-05-27T11:26:12.570+01:00SpotifyI've been using Spotify for a while now and seeing as I have just decided not to renew my premium membership I figure now is as good a time as any to write a bit about it.<br />
For those who don't know what Spotify is, Spotify is a music streaming service. You sign up for an account and you can listen to most of the music in the world (maybe) for free, with adverts. For a fee you can upgrade from this basic package and remove the audio ads. For a larger fee you can remove the ads, save the music to your computer to listen to offline, and use the mobile service.<br />
Sounds great huh? Well it is, I would argue that there is no reason anyone in the world should have not to have Spotify installed on your computer to listen to a bit of music thats stuck in your head but you dont own, or to see what this new hyped band you've been hearing about sounds like. To listen to more that twenty hours a month though, you're going to need an invite. Spotify has two free plans, Open and Free. Anyone can get an Open account, but as I said before you're limited to how much music you can listen to in a month. Invites upgrade you to Free membership which as far as I can tell is a lifelong deal. This is a new system and if you signed up when Spotify started you wont have needed an invite because at the time they didn't have the same kind of traffic to their servers that they do now. You only get invites to give out if you have at some point paid for a subscription.<br />
So you've tried out the free version for a while and Jonathan from Spotify is starting to grind your gears, or maybe you're just interested in trying the mobile client, or offline syncing? There are two paid options, Spotify Premium is what I've tried, as it was the only option available at the time. It's £10 a month and for that you get unlimited ad free streaming of Spotify's fairly extensive library at a higher bitrate than any other plan (320kbps VBR Ogg Vorbis no less). The mobile client is ok, although streaming over 3G will quickly show you how crap your mobile network is, and it currently has none of the social features I'll go into later. It's available for Android, iPhone and Symbian. You can sync albums offline on your phone and you will need to do this to listen without getting frustrated. Offline listening also has the advantage of allowing you a higher bitrate version than they allow streaming. There's also exclusive albums that only Premium subscribers can listen to although I can't say that I remember listening to a single one of them. The thing is, to justify spending £120 a year on a Spotify subscription you need to justify that to yourself somehow. You may think "well without ads I can listen to Spotify instead of CD's/ MP3s". What you will quickly realise is that Spotify isn't all the music in the world, far from it. There's a lot there, but there's a lot of very important classics missing, and new music generally arrives later than it does on iTunes. That and I'm pretty sure people like me who spend over £10 on music every month are definitely in the minority. Frankly you'll get a better experience listening to music with ads and buying albums you really like. If you're buying Spotify for something to listen to on the move, may I suggest the vastly superior Last.fm, which seems far more reliable over 3G. Now what it is good for, and what I have found myself using it for, is building playlists for filler in between bands, syncing them offline, and using that rather than CDs. It's a good enough quality when synced that I can barely tell the difference between it and CD or lossless formats like Flac.<br />
The £5 client simply removes the ads, no offline sync, no enhanced bitrate, no exclusive albums, and most of all, no mobile client. I guess it's worth it if you really hate the ads and just use Spotify at home and work with a reliable connection, and don't care about the audio quality.<br />
Just recently they introduced a few really good social features that tie your Spotify account to your Facebook account. Once the accounts are connected, you can look at your friends playlists and subscribe to any you like, as well as see tracks that they have starred. The idea of sharing Spotify playlists is not a new thing though, you can post links to Spotify playlists like <a href="http://open.spotify.com/user/hamglen/playlist/25vAnMqjdybn2qILfK4gJk">this</a>, which I have seen done particularly well by Latitude, who compiled playlists of the best tracks by all of the bands on the roster. I think once Spotify is more commonly used, this will happen more.<br />
<br />
To summarise, here's 5 reasons you should get Spotify free:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>Great for listening to new bands</li>
<li>Share playlists with your Facebook friends</li>
<li>See what your Facebook friends like</li>
<li>Great for gig filler</li>
<li>Mobile client is interesting to play with (if faulted)</li>
</ul>JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-33303044556227122202010-04-26T13:42:00.000+01:002010-04-26T13:42:38.163+01:00What I've Learned About Writing a Dissertation.Finally it's all done! My dissertation is out of the way, all finished, all printed and bound. I'll post a copy online once it's been handed in, I don't want any risk of anyone claiming it as their own or anything.<br />
I think it reads pretty well, I'm especially proud of the primary research. I think all in all it provides a pretty good grounding on many of the issues surrounding digital consoles in live audio.<br />
It struck me that there was a lot that I could have done to make my life a lot easier, most of which I was told and ignored. I thought I'd post a list of the key lessons I learned, so that any undergraduates preparing to write their dissertation might be a bit more prepared.<br />
<br />
<strong>1) Pick a Topic You Will Enjoy</strong><br />
I'd argue this is the most important point, and it's one I did actually obey. Needless to say it's a world easier to write 10000 words. More importantly though its a lot easier to read around a topic that genuinely interests you, and its near on impossible to pretend to be interested interviewing people about a topic you dont care about.<br />
<br />
<strong>2) Start Early</strong><br />
Everyone says this and everyone ignores it also. It's only human nature to leave things till the last minute and when all your friends are doing them same it makes it all the harder. A better way to think about it is decide on a topic early and start reading around it. Take notes on everything you read.Other things you can start doing early is finding people who know people that you can interview.<br />
<br />
<strong>3)Structure Your Essay Well, and Early</strong><br />
If your essay is well structured it will not only be easy to read, but much easier to break up into managable chunks and write. As silly as it sounds, the thing that helped me be most productive was writing a time table of topics I should write every day. Of course you're not going to stick to it, but at least you won't be sitting there wondering what you should be writing.<br />
<br />
<strong>4)Use a Refferancing Program</strong><br />
I don't think I could have written my dissertation without the help of <a href="http://www.zotero.org/">Zotero</a>, a free plug in for Firefox which can connect to either Word or Open Office. Refferancing is the most tedious part of writing an academic paper and there really is no need to to it manually.<br />
In addition, for a dissertation like mine, where most of my secondary research came from websites, it allows you to take notes all over the pages, automatically back up all of your sources, both on your computer and on their web servers automatically.<br />
Zotero also automatically populates your refferance list and bibliography, as well as formatting and alphabetizing them.<br />
There's also a social networking feature which I found to be mostly useless but might be of use to other people <a href="http://www.zotero.org/jcouper">(my profile)</a>JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-2319332101509309342010-04-23T19:26:00.000+01:002010-04-23T19:26:36.859+01:00A quick updateApologies about the lack of updates, I'm really busy with my dissertation which is in this Wednesday, but I will post the whole thing online when it's done for you to read. I'll get back to my usual minimum of one new blog post after that.<br />
Next week I will begin the final mix down of Science Vs Romance as well, so that should be available some time soon also.JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-49258734050968791822010-04-02T21:10:00.001+01:002010-04-02T21:16:49.001+01:005 of the best albums I have heard this year so far.I've found myself listening to loads of music the last few months, partly due to a break in work over easter and to keep myself occupied while I write this beast of a dissertation. Also because I've recently got back into using <a href="http://www.last.fm/">Last.fm</a> now that I have it on my phone. Its an awesome companion to Spotify who's catalogue is much better but sucks as a music discovery service.<br />
<b><br />
</b><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Odd-Blood-digital-booklet/dp/B0035RRFD0/ref=sr_shvl_album_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1270228378&sr=301-1"><b>Yeasayer- Odd Blood</b></a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S7Yl2iHVhGI/AAAAAAAAAHM/V1inigQUr3A/s1600/51EkKIYU5eL._SL500_AA280_.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S7Yl2iHVhGI/AAAAAAAAAHM/V1inigQUr3A/s200/51EkKIYU5eL._SL500_AA280_.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>The follow up to 2007's All Hour Cymbals, Odd Blood is a massive step forward for Yeasayer. A lot has happened for this band since All Hour Cymbals. 09 was a great year for Yeasayer, they supported MGMT and produced Bat For Lashes' hit "Two Suns" album (as well as guest appearing on a few songs). Yeasayer follow up on this with Odd Blood and odd is right, Yeasayer are all over the place. Odd Blood is a mixture of 80s pop, experimental rock and electronica. There are many highlights so far as catch pop tunes go and they're all on the first half of the album (a similar album structure to tour mates MGMT), you could argue that the album goes downhill halfway through if its singles you're interested in but theres plenty of interesting stuff in the latter half too. This is one of the most interesting albums I have heard in a while, theres something for everyone so long as you're not too fed up of 80s nostalgia already.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Colossus/dp/B003066WAS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dmusic&qid=1270228493&sr=1-1"><b>RJD2- The Colossus</b></a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S7YmRAvX3_I/AAAAAAAAAHU/9AtdKKkGf-8/s1600/61gvNmCThPL._SL500_AA280_.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S7YmRAvX3_I/AAAAAAAAAHU/9AtdKKkGf-8/s200/61gvNmCThPL._SL500_AA280_.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>This is RJ's first album for his own "RJ's Electrical Connections" label. More than any other, this album is the sound track to my dissertation. It's the best album I have yet found to write to, just catchy enough to hold my attention, but enough slow sections that I can really concentrate. This is thoroughly well made atmospheric, sample driven, soul/psychedelia inspired Hip Hop/Electronica album with some really great tracks and a massive step up from 2007's "The Third Hand".<br />
I only fear that I will come to hate it if I associate it too much with this dissertation, that would truly be a shame because this album is great.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Winter-of-Mixed-Drinks/dp/B0036W8XIU/ref=sr_shvl_album_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1270228596&sr=301-1"><b>Frightened Rabbit- A Winter of Mixed Drinks</b></a><br />
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S7YmpTlKpQI/AAAAAAAAAHc/VjX2l_Cp8F4/s1600/51udskz5xSL._SL500_AA280_.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S7YmpTlKpQI/AAAAAAAAAHc/VjX2l_Cp8F4/s200/51udskz5xSL._SL500_AA280_.jpg" width="200" /></a>Those of you that have been here before might notice this was also in my <a href="http://jcouper.blogspot.com/2010/03/few-albums-i-cant-wait-for-this-year.html">list of most anticipated albums</a> last month. Frightened rabbits are one of my favorite bands at the moment, satisfying my need for folk inspired indie rock, but also just for their well written, well recorded songs.<br />
A Winter of Mixed Drinks sees Frightened Rabbit step away from previous producer Peter Katis (for the most part) and it shows. The album is arguably not up to the same consistent standard that they set with Midnight Organ Fight, but the singles are stronger than anything they have released before. Swim Until You Can't see land is one of the catchiest songs I've heard all year and touch wood its not in anyway annoying me yet. and Nothing Like You is as good as anything the band had released previously (although it does have a piss poor chorus).<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Broken-Bells-Amazon-Exclusive-Version/dp/B003AU2PAA/ref=dm_cd_album_bb_alt?ie=UTF8&qid=1270228052&sr=8-1"><b>Broken Bells</b></a><br />
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S7YlKHrDP7I/AAAAAAAAAHE/uoB6UzBZQCs/s1600/broken+bells.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="178" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S7YlKHrDP7I/AAAAAAAAAHE/uoB6UzBZQCs/s200/broken+bells.jpg" width="200" /></a>I've been a massive fan of Dangermouse since The Grey Album, and The Shins were one of the my personal highlights of Reading 2007, so the teaming up of Dangermouse with<i></i> Shins front man James Mercer caught my attention straight away.<br />
This album blends Dangermouse's trademark beats with Mercer's folk and country inspired indie rock to great effect. The album goes from Beach Boys inspired vocal and acoustic based guitar songs like "Your Head Is on Fire", to full band, synth led, indie rock like "The High Road", to drum machine based tracks like "The Ghost Inside" (which sounds like a mixture Danger's work with Beck and Gnarls Barkley) and everything in between.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><br />
<br />
<b>Tom Caruana- Enter The Magical Mystery Chambers</b><br />
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S7Yj0Hf-18I/AAAAAAAAAG0/Ka9RQzcklXk/s1600/wu-tang-vs-the-beatles.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S7Yj0Hf-18I/AAAAAAAAAG0/Ka9RQzcklXk/s200/wu-tang-vs-the-beatles.jpg" width="200" /></a>From one guy who started his career with a mashup album featuring classic rap mashed up with Beatles samples, to an album of classic rap mashed up with Beatles samples. This time it's Tom Caruana mixing up Wu-Tang vocals with Beatles samples to great effect. It's a monster at 27 tracks but theres some real gold in there, its definitely worth a listen. It's had the <a href="http://twitter.com/RAEKWONICEWATER/status/7920606668">Raekwon seal of approval</a> which has gotta mean a lot, and the mainstream press has latched onto him, Caruana even had an i<a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/26/roll-up-the-beatles-meet-the-wu-tang-clan-in-magical-mystery-chambers/?scp=1&sq=hip-hop&st=cse">nterview in the New York Times</a> where he talks about, amongst other things, some of the samples he used in one track.<br />
It was originally hosted for free by Tea Sea Records (the label Caruana owns) but predictably its been taken down now, although I'm sure you can find it somewhere if you look hard enough. you really should try and get a copy because its really clever, very interesting stuff.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><b>Honorable Mentions:</b></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Hot Chip- One Life Stand</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Delphic- Acolyte</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Gorrilaz- Plastic Beach</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Four Tet- There's Love In You</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Animal Collective- Campfire Songs</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Phoenix- Live in Sydney</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div>JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-25777120147777104072010-03-26T19:36:00.003+00:002010-03-29T15:22:59.579+01:00Have I fallen out of touch with mainstream media?When I came to university three years ago, I moved into a flat where the only TV was in the dining room/ kitchen, a room without sofas. It wasn't a big deal really, I missed crashing on the sofa when I was tired, but anyone who spends their first year of university watching TV is missing out.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S60Mb0vJGLI/AAAAAAAAAGo/92Yi53CRx20/s1600/2512983273_04cc867efe.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="145" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S60Mb0vJGLI/AAAAAAAAAGo/92Yi53CRx20/s200/2512983273_04cc867efe.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>The next year, I moved out and into a new flat, fully furnished with a separate living room (albeit without and heating), but it never got used. The only things anyone ever watched were Top Gear and sports. TV on demand is so much better in so many ways to living by TV scheduling. Not only can you watch what you want, when you want, but you spend less time watching TV in general. I'd love to say that these new found hours get spent doing more work and expanding my mind in general but theres just far more fun things to do with my time.<br />
Apart from something to watch while eating dinner sometimes, or a film every now and again, its pretty true to say that I watch no broadcast TV whatsoever, I watch iPlayer, 4OD and I watch Lost and Fringe by downloading it and watching it when I want. I suspect I'm not alone here, TV andvertising budgets are shrinking along with their viewing figures for years. Headlines regularly suggest that ITV is fucked although it seems to struggle on, mostly on the back of a few big reality shows.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><object height="265" style="clear: right; float: right;" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ryH2WemACIM&hl=en_GB&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ryH2WemACIM&hl=en_GB&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></div>But recently I saw a video which has been circulating on the internet from The Alan Titchmarsh Show of all things. I've embedded the video below but I'll give you a brief overview of the show. Its that same argument people have been making since columbine, that kids play games then shoot people in real life. In fact, its the same argument we've been hearing since rock and roll was accused of taking our children's innocence away. The problem that I had with it was that Tim Ingham, editor at CVG and the guy brought in to argue for games. He was the only one willing to have a discussion, he said that kids shouldn't be playing adult games and that not only are they legally unable to buy them, but due to the new features in modern games consoles, parents can stop their kids playing age rated games they may have got hold of, without a password. Spot on Ingham, how could you possibly argue that non-violent games are fun in moderation and that kids shouldn't be playing age rated games and that parents should be aware of the content of adult games. He also suggested that violent games are no worse than hardcore pornography and violent films, which kids do have access to, more so than ever before.<br />
But, and heres where I got angry, and frankly disillusioned with humanity in general. Not only were the rest of the guests completely unwilling to have an intelligent debate about the validity of games as art, but the crowd were unwilling to listen. The sheer idiocy of refusing to listen to someone who you disagree with without yelling boo at them so they cant finish their point is so upsetting to me that it worries me about what kind of people actually watch TV. Is this kind of thing really acceptable to the people that haven't migrated from TV to the internet for the bulk of their entertainment? Bear in mind that this is a show on at around 5, thats the beginning of prime time, and its the kind of show intended to appeal to parents. Parents need a balanced view of this sort of thing if they are to make reasonable decisions rather than "no you cant play games with your friends online, you must sit in front of the idiot box and watch good old Alan murder the art of conversation.<br />
Now on the plus side spawned <a href="http://playstuff.tumblr.com/post/471266385/ignorance">outcry</a> <a href="http://6lessons.blogspot.com/2010/03/im-video-gamer-not-murderer.html">on</a> <a href="http://www.thetotalgamer.com/?p=2423">the</a> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/gamesblog/2010/mar/23/alan-titchmarsh-show-games">internet</a> where us gamers spend our time in between all the murders we're committing and all of the time we spend encouraging children to consume adult orientated content (although that does beg the question, who was watching this drivel in the first place).<br />
There is intelligent TV on this subject, take Charlie Brooker's Gameswipe, which takes a balanced outlook on games. But this kind of stuff is pushed onto BBC4 late at night, where no-one will see it. The fact that the balanced discussion on topics like this is produced is in a way even worse because it means that commercial forces mean that the bilge makes its way to primetime because thats what viewers want to see. its the same reason the X Factor is primetime, but Jools Holland is relegated to late at night.<br />
<br />
<object height="265" style="clear: left; float: left;" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gjFiTd2nmI4&hl=en_GB&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gjFiTd2nmI4&hl=en_GB&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object>Oh, and it turns out the idiot shouting woman voice-<a href="http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=239985">acted in a horror game</a> called Martian Gothic. Just in case the story wasn't ludicrous enough for you.JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-34898579961108579912010-03-19T15:27:00.000+00:002010-03-19T15:27:52.098+00:00My opinion on the Pink Floyd caseThe other day, Pink Floyd won their court case against EMI, meaning that EMI is no longer allowed to sell the Floyd's music track by track online as well as offline. Now a lot of people think that this is idiotic on Pink Floyd's case, because it is now the norm that people buy individual tracks from iTunes skipping buying the filler on the album and saving money which they can spend on more great music. Pink Floyd put the clause into their contract saying that they did not want single tracks released in the days when the album was king and singles were considered uncool. They wanted people to listen to the whole albums rather than individual tracks because of the way they make music. A Pink Floyd single does not have the same impact that listening to The Wall, Dark Side of the Moon, or Wish You Were Here in its entirety has. Their live shows were based around their albums, the tour on the back of The Wall was essentially an extension of the album. You can see why they would want people to listen to the album as a whole.<br />
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S6OW5tAjf8I/AAAAAAAAAFM/wdePTzvAqbk/s1600-h/Dark_Side_of_the_Moon.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S6OW5tAjf8I/AAAAAAAAAFM/wdePTzvAqbk/s200/Dark_Side_of_the_Moon.png" width="200" /></a>The argument that this just doesn't make business sense seems crazy to me. OK, their sales will probably suffer, but why would Pink Floyd care? I'm sure none of them are short of money at this stage, the only thing important to them at this stage is maintaining their artistic integrity. I think that the worst thing that could happen to their legacy is if they ended up being thought of as the band that wrote Money and Another Brick in the Wall, just another band with a couple of hit singles.<br />
Now why EMI would want to monetize their back catalogue, that makes a lot of sense. The two things that EMI does really well is publishing and having the best back catalogue in the world. They're struggling at the moment, possibly more than the other two majors but these two arms seem to be holding up pretty well. The logic of trying to build new catalogue that can support the future of the company, despite it losing money at the moment, on the back of the other two arms makes a lot of sense.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S6OXj20WIDI/AAAAAAAAAFU/iTdft-S9AIY/s1600-h/1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="135" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S6OXj20WIDI/AAAAAAAAAFU/iTdft-S9AIY/s320/1.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>But in a business that hinges on cutting artists a terrible deal that they sign and then milking them for all they can, why would a record company have such disregard for contracts the other way round? This clause in their contract I assume was pretty pivotal in Pink Floyd signing with EMI, and they did agree to it. The idea that digital singles are somehow different from CD or Vinyl singles is the exact argument that the record companies have been arguing against for years. In a standard contract, you will still pay the same packaging deduction from your royalty whether it is a physical or a digital single and yet somehow in someone's head, it doesn't count in the same way for clauses in your contract.<br />
This is the typical arse-headed behavior that makes people hate the majors. Screwing over the people that make them their money.JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-45655840827791753122010-03-19T13:04:00.001+00:002010-03-19T15:33:51.591+00:00ArseholesEvery now and again at work, everyone comes across a person who it seems is going out of their way to make your life more difficult. When things begin to go wrong they revel in it, even if it will make their life more difficult later on. Anything that goes wrong is someone elses fault and they will accept no responsibility. Anything that people suggest is a stupid idea even if it is a method that has worked time and time again.<br />
In live music, teamwork is one of the most important skills you can have. The ability to get along with people is as important a part of getting people to trust you as having the skills or the experience. There's no place for massive egos when you're working as part of a team, where anyone can make a mistake and it will effect the running of the event.<br />
Being an arsehole is counter intuative, and to everyone around you, makes you look like the fool, not to mention unexperienced.JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-90905925234990416232010-03-08T13:58:00.000+00:002010-03-08T13:58:57.223+00:00A few albums I can't wait for this year.<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S5TwhfcF3ZI/AAAAAAAAAEU/NFRixzvoHg8/s1600-h/Jonsi-go-cover.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="196" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S5TwhfcF3ZI/AAAAAAAAAEU/NFRixzvoHg8/s200/Jonsi-go-cover.jpg" width="200" /></a></div><b>Jonsi- Go</b><br />
I'm not entirely sure where I first heard Sigur Ros, probably on a BBC ad for some wildlife program, but I remember the first album I listened to, and I remember how I felt after. The odly named "()" was one of those few albums that comes around that really does change how you think about what constitutes good music, and makes you wonder what else you'e missed with your particular brand of snobbery. Oddly it was probably this mental shift that got me listening to more music, completely unrelated to the post-rock ambience of Sigur Ros.<br />
Sigur Ros haven't released anything now since 2008, but Jonsi released the interesting if slightly disappointing Riceboy Sleeps with his boyfriend Alex last year, which was essentially a solo effort, with alex proiding the visual art for the album. I was only disappointed with Riceboy Sleeps because of what came before it, which was in my opinion the best Sigur Ros album to date- Með Suð Í Eyrum Við Spilum Endalaust, the perfect compromise between their spacey atmospheric older music, and a more traditional rock band. Also, this album holds a special place because it was on this tour that I saw them on, which is one of the best gigs I have ever seen.<br />
<br />
So here we are in 2010, and Jonsi is releasing a solo album, two tracks of which, Boy Lilikoi and Go Do, were released as teasers and sound up there with the best bits of Með Suð Í Eyrum Við Spilum Endalaust. Boy Lilikoi sounds like pretty typical Sigur Ros, but Go Do is something completely different. It's Produced by Peter Katis, who also produced fantastic records for Fanfarlo and Frightened Rabbit. If Jonsi can match some of the stuff he has done before, I will be ecstatically pleased.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<object height="265" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/c1WomtTi0wY&hl=en_GB&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/c1WomtTi0wY&hl=en_GB&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S5T3Hab4H4I/AAAAAAAAAEc/snhAS_-FS8M/s1600-h/Frabbit452.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S5T3Hab4H4I/AAAAAAAAAEc/snhAS_-FS8M/s200/Frabbit452.jpg" width="200" /></a><br />
<b>Frightened Rabbit- The Winter of Mixed Drinks</b><br />
OK OK I know this was released March 1st but I'm still waiting for it to come in the post so its going in. Midnight Organ Fight was an album I only heard about halfway through last year even though it came out in 2008. Frightened Rabbit are a band that encompasses everything I love about british indie rock at the moment. Thick vocal harmonies, interesting folk instruments, catchy but not annoying songs, all mixed up with interesting accents.<br />
This album was written and mostly recorded in Scotland unlike their previous effort, and the band has said that this has effected the sound of the record a great deal. It's been a much more meticulous studio effort, less of a live album than Midnight Organ Fight, with each instrument being tracked individually this time, which front man Scott Hutchinson insists is the way he prefers to make records.<br />
It's been receiving some pretty good reviews, although not in the same kind of way that Midnight Organ Fight did. I'm really excited to hear it.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" height="340" id="muzuplayer-frightenedrabbit-1268053889469" width="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.muzu.tv/player/getPlayer/a/TNdksjMc2zUSJY6R/vidId=568433"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000"></param><param name="quality" value="high"></param><embed src="http://www.muzu.tv/player/getPlayer/a/TNdksjMc2zUSJY6R/vidId=568433" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="always" wmode="transparent" quality="high" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" width="400" height="340" name="muzuplayer-frightenedrabbit-1268053889469"></embed></object><br />
<b><br />
</b><br />
<br />
<br />
<b>MGMT- Congratulations</b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S5T9LShnPrI/AAAAAAAAAEk/zZ0f8uv7ypU/s1600-h/600px-MGMT_Congratulations.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S5T9LShnPrI/AAAAAAAAAEk/zZ0f8uv7ypU/s200/600px-MGMT_Congratulations.jpg" width="200" /></a></div><br />
If you were alive in 2008 I don't think I really need to introduce MGMT. In case you were asleep, they were very much the sound of 2008 (along with Vampire Weekend). Incredibly catchy drug inspired indie rock with a heavy 70's psychedelia influence. This time they're in the studio with Pete Kember of Shoegazing band Spaceman 3. Don't expect any big singles like Electric Feel or Kids though because for one thing, the band has been pretty adamant that they don't want to release any singles from this album. Quite how much difference that will make in these days of iTunes a la carte style purchasing but its refreshing to hear a band talking about how they want their album listen to as a whole. That and the album is by all reports, completely different to the first half of Oracular Spectacular.<br />
<br />
<b>Stone Temple Pilots- Stone Temple Pilots</b><br />
<br />
I'm gonna come right out and say it, I hated Velvet Revolver. I could tolerate Slash's wankey guitars and the pomp rock of it all, but Scott Weiland drove me nuts. The problem I think was that as shit as Axl Rose is, Weiland pretending to be Rose is twice as bad. But at least he can still sing which gives me hope for this, Stone Temple Pilots' first album in nine years. I don't have very much to say about this. Core was one of the albums that shaped my childhood listening habits and I assume this will sound nothing like Core (you'd hope not in 2010) but it sure as hell can't suck as hard as Velvet Revolver. It's also the first STP album not to be produced by Brenden O'Brien, which should be interesting.<br />
<br />
<b>Devo</b><br />
<br />
An album which surely can't be bad is Devo's yet to be titled comeback record. Mark Mothersbaugh said of the new album that"These new songs are pretty true to what we would be doing if we would have gone into suspended animation 20 years ago and just woke up". And if it's anything else, we'll forgive them, because they're Devo.<br />
<br />
<img border="0" height="0" src="http://counters.gigya.com/wildfire/IMP/CXNID=2000002.0NXC/bT*xJmx*PTEyNjgwNTY1NDg5MTYmcHQ9MTI2ODA1NjYyNDc2MCZwPTExNDA2NjEmZD*mZz*yJm89Yzc2ZjFkYWQ*ZmQ*NGViYmE3/YTE2NjZlZmMyMTgyMDYmb2Y9MA==.gif" style="height: 0px; visibility: hidden; width: 0px;" width="0" /><object align="middle" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0" height="300" id="Devo Fresh Widget" width="230"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="false" /><param name="movie" value="http://download.wbr.com/devo/widget/DevoWidget.swf" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://download.wbr.com/devo/widget/DevoWidget.swf" quality="high" bgcolor="#000000" width="230" height="300" name="Devo Fresh Widget" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" allowFullScreen="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" /></object>JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-23156281557089997892010-03-03T16:29:00.000+00:002010-03-03T16:29:27.420+00:00My New Phone!I reached breaking point the other day with my old phone, the <a href="http://www.inqmobile.com/lang/en/inq1">INQ1</a> which I can quite safely say is the worst phone I've ever owned. After owning it for six months, the battery would last around about six hours when left alone in my pocket, or about fifteen minutes during a phone call, or mild to moderate usage. Besides the battery life, which I would have been perfectly happy to solve with a new battery, the phone crashed from the day I got it, simply surfing the internet, or opening a Java app would cause the screen to flicker and die, or the phone to reboot of it's own accord.<br />
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42aeKSCenI/AAAAAAAAADM/GD8DTvZWdBE/s1600-h/IMAG0014.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="150" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42aeKSCenI/AAAAAAAAADM/GD8DTvZWdBE/s200/IMAG0014.jpg" width="200" /></a><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42ZtomNkII/AAAAAAAAADE/x1b17CHGj0M/s1600-h/IMAG0012.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42ZtomNkII/AAAAAAAAADE/x1b17CHGj0M/s200/IMAG0012.jpg" width="150" /></a><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42agoAC13I/AAAAAAAAADU/Xmio3Z9aqkc/s1600-h/IMAG0015.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="150" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42agoAC13I/AAAAAAAAADU/Xmio3Z9aqkc/s200/IMAG0015.jpg" width="200" /></a>Now there was one thing I liked about that phone, and that was it's integration with Facebook. I'm not a great user of Facebook, but everone else is. The INQ1 did a great job of integrating people's Facebook profiles with their profile on the phone, meaning you could see their photos, birthday, etc straight from the address book. Also, the INQ1 having a tiny internal memory, and the mind blowing move of putting the memory card slot under the battery so that you couldn't switch it over without cutting the power (despite the fact that the sim was above the battery!) was made into much less of a problem by the fact that any pictures taken could be automatically uploaded to Facebook.<br />
Now I was pretty set from the start that I wanted a phone that runs <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_%28operating_system%29">Google's Android</a> operating system, because I use all of Google's services, from Blogger, to Calendar, to GMail, to Reader and I assumed that these services would be better integrated into this platform better than any other. Also, after the success of the iPhone's app store I wanted a phone with an active community making apps for it so that I could do some of the fun things I see my iPhone equipped friends playing with. I wasn't interested in an iPhone, mainly because everyone has one, but also because of the lack of multitasking, and Apple's stranglehold on their app store.<br />
The three Android phones which seem to get by far the best reviews are the <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/smartphones/htc-hero-unlocked/4505-6452_7-33702036.html?tag=mncol;lst">HTC Hero</a>, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/04/nexus-one-review/">Google Nexus One</a>, and the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">Motorola Droid/Milestone</a>. I flat out could not afford any of these out of contract and I'm not due an upgrade for a long while yet.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42kA4lfaNI/AAAAAAAAADc/HsnFCnWiy4A/s1600-h/imgHtc+Tattoo1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42kA4lfaNI/AAAAAAAAADc/HsnFCnWiy4A/s320/imgHtc+Tattoo1.jpg" /></a></div>What I settled on in the end was the <a href="http://www.htc.com/www/product/tattoo/overview.html">HTC Tattoo</a> which is essentially a stripped down version of the Hero, but unlike the hero, it is currently half price at <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/HTC-Tattoo-Android-SIM-Free-Mobile/dp/B002OHCRUI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1267576907&sr=8-1">Amazon</a>. The screen is much smaller than the Hero, and it is resistive rather than capacitive, which means that it isn't as sensitive (although it is much more responsive than I expected). The other thing which has been cut back on is the camera, there is no flash, which doesn't bother me too much, and no auto-focus which does. No auto-focus, as well as meaning that I take blurry photo's like the ones above, also means that apps which rely on a good picture, such as barcode readers and retina scanners can't work, which something I didn't think of before purchase.<br />
A pleasant surprise was that the Facebook support I so loved on my INQ1 is one of the features added by HTC's <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kax24GN1458">Sense</a> interface included with both this phone and the Hero. I would go so far as to say that HTC's implementation of Facebook integration blows INQ's out of the water. Photos can be uploaded not just to Facebook, but also to Flikr, Picasa, and to the native Twitter app, Peep which in turn can upload them to your choice of Twitter image site.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42lFU8tAlI/AAAAAAAAADk/hume5-GTfBQ/s1600-h/VIP-HTC-Tattoo.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="169" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42lFU8tAlI/AAAAAAAAADk/hume5-GTfBQ/s200/VIP-HTC-Tattoo.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>An odd little extra that the phone has, is a dedicated website from HTC so that you can design your own covers for the phone (like a real tattoo I guess). I'm not going to do this, because I'd make it look stupid I suspect, that and it's a waste of money, but maybe someone would like this feature.<br />
All in all, I adore it, even though the screen is too small to type in portrait orientation, and the camera flat out sucks, all the strengths of the software and the not by any means shabby build quality totally make up for it. One of the main advantages over the iPhone is that, while it does have an app store (with far more free apps than Apple's) you are by no means locked to apps just from the store. Just like any computer, you can open up the browser, find an app you like the look of and install it from a .APK file (similar to a .exe installer file). All of this means that there are an awful lot of fantastic apps to extend an Android phone with. Here's a few of my favorite ones that I've found so far. They're all free, although some only for a limited time, or with limited features.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42s2ervpcI/AAAAAAAAADs/J83UWokijto/s1600-h/meebo_im_android_os_2.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42s2ervpcI/AAAAAAAAADs/J83UWokijto/s200/meebo_im_android_os_2.png" width="133" /></a></div>Firstly, The best IM client I could find is <a href="http://www.meebo.com/android/">Meebo IM</a>. It is essentially a version of the popular browser based IM client, in an application. It supports Facebook chat, MSN Messenger, AIM, Google Talk, ICQ, Jabber, Myspace chat and YIM. I cant claim to have used all of those as I only use Facebook, MSN and Google but it sure beats booting up three separate clients<br />
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42ti9E7lqI/AAAAAAAAAD0/BKP1MqLpC8o/s1600-h/344_0_m.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="190" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42ti9E7lqI/AAAAAAAAAD0/BKP1MqLpC8o/s200/344_0_m.jpg" width="200" /></a>An app which has come in very handy is <a href="http://www.killermobile.com/applications/android/total-recall-android-call-recorder.html">Total Recall</a>, which is only free for a certain time, then you have to pay for it. The app basically records either all of your incoming, or outgoing calls, or both. This has come in handy for my dissertation research, so I can record my phone conversations without the need for any extra equipment. The sound quality is good, but my voice was recorded much louder than the person's voice I was talking to. It also only records in .MP4, .AMR or .3GPP formats. Luckily <a href="http://audacity.sourceforge.net/">Audacity</a> can import MP4 audio, which allowed me to compress the audio so that I could hear the other person and save the file as a .wav or .mp3 so that I could play the file in programs other than Quicktime.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42t9WlJf6I/AAAAAAAAAD8/e7Kjq059VmA/s1600-h/shazam-listening.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="133" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42t9WlJf6I/AAAAAAAAAD8/e7Kjq059VmA/s200/shazam-listening.jpg" width="200" /></a></div><a href="http://www.shazam.com/">Shazam</a> is a program that can tell you what any song playing is simply by recording a short snippet and then matching it to it's library. Surprisingly, this works almost all of the time. Another cool feature is that after it has told you the song name, it can link you to copies of the song on You Tube, or Amazon mp3. It also saves a log of all the songs you "tag" so that you can look them up later.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42uV93zw_I/AAAAAAAAAEE/9fcLelck08Q/s1600-h/2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42uV93zw_I/AAAAAAAAAEE/9fcLelck08Q/s200/2.jpg" width="200" /></a></div><a href="http://layar.com/">Layar</a> is an augmented reality app where you look through your camera and it uses your phone's built in GPS system and digital compass to overlay a layer. Layers include one to show you who has tweeted nearby, information or architecture, London underground info, restaurant reviews, or directions to things like post boxes, hotels, pubs and golf courses. It's pretty interesting, although I suspect it would work much better in a big city, and would be dull out in the country.<br />
All the Google apps are great (as you would expect) these include maps (which can give turn by turn spoken directions), Google earth, Google sky map (which tells you what star you're pointing your camera at), Gmail, Calendar and You Tube. Interestingly there is no native Blogger app, so I'll have to stick to the web based client unless I can find a third party app.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42un8VKDFI/AAAAAAAAAEM/dbDoQgYIZQ0/s1600-h/androidapps_03.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42un8VKDFI/AAAAAAAAAEM/dbDoQgYIZQ0/s200/androidapps_03.jpg" width="133" /></a></div>Whilst multi-tasking is one of the strengths of android, It's also a weakness. Apps running in the background you may have thought you closed will eat up your processor power and RAM, but there is a solution. <a href="http://www.taskiller.com/">TasKiller</a> is an app dedicated to closing other apps. You can either go through a list of apps and close what you want, or add a widget to your desktop that you can click to close all non-essential apps when you feel your handset getting sluggish.<br />
All in all I'm thrilled with my new phone and I would definitely suggest it to anyone looking for a smart phone for under £200. And I'm hooked on Android now, good going Google.JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-33649347860815541552010-03-02T22:39:00.000+00:002010-03-02T22:39:22.251+00:00Recording Science Vs Romance<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42TEeTZ30I/AAAAAAAAAC0/80hDbKMy0M8/s1600-h/IMAG0010.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42TEeTZ30I/AAAAAAAAAC0/80hDbKMy0M8/s200/IMAG0010.jpg" width="150" /></a>Its been a while, I need to post more often really but uni is starting to get really busy now. my dissertation is well and truly under way, I've had a fair bit of work recently, and Mass Effect 2 came out which may well be the best game I have ever played (although thats probably a tie between it, the original, Metal Gear Solid and Psychonauts).<br />
On top of that I've been in the studio with <a href="http://www.myspace.com/sciencevsromancemusic">Science Vs Romance</a>, which was my first time in the studio in about a year, and my first real experience with Pro Tools 8 (despite me buying it months ago, as I said, it's been busy).<br />
SvR have had a slight change in direction with their new material, it's much less pop-punk meets Minus The Bear and much more indie rock meets At The Drive In. <br />
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42RXFMExaI/AAAAAAAAACs/wWy2BNe26Gk/s1600-h/IMAG0002.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="150" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42RXFMExaI/AAAAAAAAACs/wWy2BNe26Gk/s200/IMAG0002.jpg" width="200" /></a>We've had two weekends so far of tracking and most of the editing has been done at home on my LE system. The first weekend was split between pre-production and tracking drums, bass and rhythm guitars. We've been fortunate in being able to get a band made up of such great players that we could blast through all of that in two days, I certainly wasn't expecting to get so much done. Tracking at the university's new studios has given me my first experience with an Icon desk, which is beautiful, and much less daunting than the three interfaces I've previously used (the C24, Digi 002, and the Control 24) and yet far more powerful.<br />
Comping afterwards was made infinitely quicker by PT8's new playlist track view, which if you haven't seen it yet allows you to see all your playlists for one track at once, solo them one by one, and send sections to a new playlist at the top. This is pretty similar to the way logic takes care of it, except that it doesn't necessarily insert auto-cross fades for you.<br />
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42RVAOwLeI/AAAAAAAAACk/mcNND6pWDPk/s1600-h/IMAG0004.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="150" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dVDvNtpJ3-A/S42RVAOwLeI/AAAAAAAAACk/mcNND6pWDPk/s200/IMAG0004.jpg" width="200" /></a>On the second weekend, we recorded all of the vocals and Stu's twiddley guitars which is now the bulk of the session recorded down.<br />
I'd love to show you some of the stuff we've recorded but you'll have to wait until it's all mixed I'm afraid. This is definitely the best recordings I have produced to date and I wish SvR all the luck in the world, they could do great things.<br />
In other news, I got a new phone the other day to replace the atrocious Inq1 I've been struggling with for what seems like an age. Its great, I'll give you a run through some time this week.JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-52281339146642348512010-01-01T15:35:00.000+00:002010-01-01T15:35:09.651+00:00Happy new year!Holy crap, its 2010! If anyone is interested, my resolution is to remember more birthdays this year because last year, I was terrible.<br />
2010 is also the year that I get back into the studio, this time with Stourbridge based alt-rockers <a href="http://www.myspace.com/sciencevsromancemusic">Science Vs. Romance</a>. <a href="http://www.scotthumphries.info/">Scott</a>, <a href="http://darrenhall.wordpress.com/">Darren</a> and I are hoping to get some great stuff out of them, they sound fantastic live.<br />
I'm preparing to start my primary research for my dissertation now, it's going to be about work-flow issues in digital consoles when moving from analogue mixing desks. Should mean I get to talk to some really interesting people and learn some useful stuffJCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-3577606608834006972009-12-18T00:35:00.000+00:002009-12-18T00:35:09.554+00:00My Top Albums of 2009Looks like it's getting towards the end of the year, so maybe its time for the obligatory top lists of 2009. Never having been a slave to tradition, here's my top eight albums of the past twelve months.<br />
<br />
<b>8) Hazards Of Love-The Decemberists</b><br />
<br />
This one is an album that is as much an annoyance of mine as it is a love. I'm a big sap for any music so much as hinting at prog-rock which I think is why I listened enough to get past Meloy's whiny annoying vocals. Once I was past that, I was left with an album I fell in love with, grew tired of, stopped listening to, put back on a month later and realized why I loved it so much in the first place, a pattern which repeated through most of the year.<br />
The builds are glorious, the guitars sound fantastic and the musicianship is pretty faultless. The lows are monotonous and the soppy sections are over sentimental.<br />
Still, the peaks more than make up for the troughs and perhaps wouldn't seem as glorious without the arduous slog up hill to get to them.<br />
<br />
<object height="265" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WfKhydixkeA&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WfKhydixkeA&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<br />
<b>7) Riceboy Sleeps-Jonsi and Alex</b><br />
<br />
I'm gonna say from the top that I adore Sigur Ros, and that anyone who doesn't like their breed of Icelandic post-rock is going to loathe this release by their lead singer Jonsi and his boyfriend Alex. It sounds an awful lot like Sigur Ros, but even more so, with a whole lot more of the tranquil soundscapes and less of the actual "music". It's gorgeous, its meandering, it's what helped me concentrate on most of my essays this year and it's got me very excited about <a href="http://jonsi.com/">Jonsi</a>'s debut solo album "Go" which sounds all together more like you would expect it to sound. If you love Sigur Ros and you haven't already, you owe it to yourself to give Riceboy Sleeps a good listen. If you're not sold on Sigur Ros yet, give the free track on Jonsi's home page a listen.<br />
<br />
<object height="265" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iCfe1XLZuEI&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iCfe1XLZuEI&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<b>6) Octahedron- The Mars Volta</b><br />
<br />
This is by no means ground breaking stuff, I remember reading reviews of this album saying that The Mars Volta had drastically changed their style and being reluctant to listen to it. It is true however that this is a much quieter album than all of their previous efforts. In my opinion, this is a nice middle ground between Omar's meandering solo guitar doodle albums and classic Mars Volta.<br />
All of the slow quiet numbers like Since You've Been Gone make for more intense crescendos into the fast loud tracks and sections such as Cotapaxi.<br />
After two albums that struggled to hold my interest, its nice to see The Mars Volta trying a new direction, even if it did upset a few. There's nothing more boring than a band scared of taking risks<br />
<br />
<object height="265" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/a00bq1hU-2k&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/a00bq1hU-2k&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object><br />
<b><br />
</b><br />
<b>5) Far-Regina Spector</b><br />
<br />
This is an album that, if I had heard earlier in the year, would no doubt be way further up this list, its growing on me like some beautiful voiced fungus.<br />
The simple enchanting melodies sung over a minimal backdrop of mostly drum machines and piano, beautifully arranged and recorded. It makes me feel guilty for not listening to this earlier.<br />
Anyway, listen to this.<br />
<br />
<object height="265" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CPMIXk-ipT0&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CPMIXk-ipT0&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object><br />
<b><br />
</b><br />
<b>4) Backspacer-Pearl Jam</b><br />
<br />
Pearl Jam are an interesting band in that they are one of the only existing grunge bands, due in no small part I'm sure to the fact that they haven't made a grunge record since Vs in 93. There's nothing more embarrassing than middle aged men screaming their teenage angst out (I'm looking at you Green Day) which is why the idea of PJ returning to their punk rock roots worried me.<br />
But that isn't what this album is like at all, it's not all fast, it shows PJ's full range of sounds, from the corny pop-rock, to a few ballads, and yet, those few fast, loose punky tracks which are the best tracks on the album.<br />
It isn't a bunch of old men trying to be hip, as with all of their releases, this is good intelligent American rock music. If their last album hadn't been twice as good this album would likely have been my number two choice this year.<br />
<object height="265" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ri6PpeRxI9w&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ri6PpeRxI9w&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<b>3) Wolfgang Amadeus Phoenix-Phoenix</b><br />
<br />
Yet another album I heard too late in the year. Catchy hooks, tongue in cheek lyrics, its much deeper than you might expect from the first listen, but from the first listen I was stuck on this album. Something truly unique, yet pleasingly familiar. Just a well written indie rock album from France.<br />
<br />
<object height="295" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4BJDNw7o6so&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4BJDNw7o6so&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<b>2) Resevoir-Fanfarlo</b><br />
<br />
A lesson should be learned here by artists struggling to shift units, you're not gonna make a fortune until people know who you are. When I found out that the digital copy of this album was on sale for $1 at their website, it caught my interest, and after some listening I realized that it is a glorious album worthy of a full price purchase (which by the way, their album is selling at again now).<br />
This is an unmistakably British rock album with some really interesting instrumentation and some thoroughly well written songs. Horns and strings are as big of a part of the sound as the guitars and they are used very tastefully. I simply love the atmosphere of this album, from emotional low to dramatic highs. I wish these guys all the luck in the world.<br />
<br />
<object height="295" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PsXhQfIZD2c&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PsXhQfIZD2c&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<b>1) Veckatimest-Grizzly Bear</b><br />
This album grabbed my attention like no other this year. If I love the atmosphere of Fanfarlo's album then I adore the atmosphere of this. Big four part harmonies, dirty bass tones, massive drums, subtle use of strings, and loads of gorgeous reverb. Great dynamics, great musicianship and most of all, terribly ambitious.<br />
All of this note perfect arrangement around a thoroughly interesting and catchy set of songs that I've been listening to religiously since the day it was released back in May. Each song is so very different from the one before it and yet these album sounds very cohesive.<br />
This is very different and utterly brilliant. Couple that with the brilliant videos the band has released for the singles from this album and you have hands down, my album of the year.<br />
<object height="295" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Puph1hejMQE&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Puph1hejMQE&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object>JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-72825889689683362832009-12-01T13:00:00.000+00:002009-12-01T13:00:32.779+00:00Microsoft and the BBC are both stubborn arses.So it seems that the reason PS3 and Wii users get iPlayer but us 360 owners don't is down to <a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/gamesgear/0,39029441,49304434,00.htm">an argument which has ended in stalemate</a>. Apparently, Microsoft want the iPlayer on Xbox Live, but only to gold subscribers, but the BBC has decided that people shouldn't have to pay a premium to get iPlayer as it's license fee funded. So what about people like me who already pay both fees? I couldn't care less if people could get it for free if they were silver members, and I also wouldn't care if it was only available to us gold subscribers. I see why Microsoft want to add value to their gold subscription, although you can already make this work for free with a <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/23/how-to-watch-the-bbc-iplayer-on-the-xbox-360/">bit of tweaking</a> if you have a Windows machine (not that I can test that), and I do see the Beeb's problem with people having to pay a subscription to watch it, but what about what their customers want? I cant see any 360 owners getting angry at getting what the PS3 and Wii has had for a while now, and I can't see license payers getting angry at having to pay a gold subscription to use a free service.<br />
The only person looking stupid here (apart from us saps that give both of these companies our money) is Microsoft. If i was looking for a games console now, and I wanted games rather than keep fit activities and gimmicky kids games, I'd have to get a PS3. It wont break, I don't have to pay a subscription to play online (although I would have no friends to play with), it has a Blu Ray drive (not that I'm interested in buying any Blu Rays), built in wifi, cheap HDDs, and it's essentially a DVR for the BBC (and what other British networks ever make good TV anyway). And now after a price drop (at last) its not much more expensive, much cheaper if you factor in however much you will pay for gold subscription, and repairs once it goes out of warrenty.<br />
Its reasons like this that the PS3 is gaining back market share, and why I feel less and less happy paying my TV license. I'm not moving from my Xbox for a while though, I need to play Mass Effect 2.JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-76211912570717275152009-11-09T21:33:00.001+00:002009-11-10T13:05:16.486+00:003 Strike MadnessI'm sure if you keep up with the news in any way you're heard of the new three strikes copyright law. This is where if you are caught filesharing (or rather if an IP address linked to you is accused of filesharing) you are given three two chances, then your bandwidth is capped, essentially cutting you off from any bandwidth intensive activities.<br />
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/79/Spotify_logo.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/79/Spotify_logo.png" /></a>The first thing that springs to mind from that, assuming that it is in any way possible, is that this will not stop people file-sharing, as it will just take longer to download stuff. What it will hurt is streaming, video and audio on demand. That is the stuff that is generally legal, it's going to mean that if you get caught downloading music or TV, you then can't move to a legal alternative such as <a href="http://www.spotify.com/en/">Spotify</a> or <a href="http://skyplayer.sky.com/vod/page/64/home.do">SkyPlayer</a>. This isn't just a problem for the ex-filesharers, its a problem for the companies trying to forge new business models, and as an extension, its bad for you, the people who want to use these new legal alternatives.<br />
<a href="http://www.colinjensen.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/sky-player-comes-xbox-360-2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="http://www.colinjensen.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/sky-player-comes-xbox-360-2.jpg" width="320" /></a>I shan't talk too much about how impossible it is to track down and prove that you have accurately tracked down someone who is in breach of copyright, because there are a million and one people better mentally equipped to talk about that, but I will talk about what really makes me angry which is a sentence completely ridiculous compared to the crime being committed.<br />
Cutting off someone's internet because they download content illegally over the internet is like cutting off someone's electricity for the same reason. This becomes even more relevant when you consider that the Constitutional Council of France has recently referred to the internet as a <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_internet_access_a_fundamental_human_right_franc.php">fundamental human right</a>.<br />
<a href="http://richardwillisuk.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/mandelson.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="308" src="http://richardwillisuk.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/mandelson.jpg" width="320" /></a>To remove someone from the rest of the world for committing a crime is a bizarre punishment, The reason I suspect France considers the internet such an important utility in the modern world, is that it is difficult to do business without it these days. And is alienating people from the job market a good way to ensure that they pay for media?<br />
Never mind all the evidence which shows that file-sharers are the entertainment industry's best customers. Or the fact that that the film industry had a record breaking year last year. Or the fact that an awful lot of filesharing happens because things are not available, not because the filesharers refuse to pay for them. Lets just scare everyone into behaving. They'll like that. That'll make them want to fork over your ridiculous prices. Fuck you <a href="http://www.trueknowledge.com/q/mandelson">Peter Mandelson</a>. If there's a party with the balls to oppose this, I'll vote for them at the next election. Yes even if that party is the Conservatives.JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-3061369364352086562009-11-05T13:44:00.000+00:002009-11-06T18:10:25.605+00:00It's Been a While<div>It's been a pretty long while since I wrote anything on this, which is a shame as I've been pretty super busy. Since I've last written I've gone back to uni for my final year which is getting pretty hectic now, but lots of exciting projects coming up. I've also gone back to work at <a href="http://www.bucksstudent.com/">Bucks Student Union</a> as one of their in house engineers, which is pretty fun.<br />So far as projects go, I've got a big studio project coming up. My group is still going through the tail end of the A+R section of it, but I'm pretty enthused about working with <a href="http://www.myspace.com/darwinandthedinosaur">Darwin and the Dinosaur</a>. <a href="http://c4.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/100/l_cd7d093ac43c47d58b7dacd87746eafb.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 392px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 277px" alt="" src="http://c4.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/100/l_cd7d093ac43c47d58b7dacd87746eafb.jpg" border="0" /></a>I got <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">introduced</span> to them by my good friend Sunny from <a href="http://www.myspace.com/inanemergencydial">In An Emergency Dial</a>. They're <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">basically</span> pop-punk, but that I enjoy somehow. Anyone who's spoken to me about music for any length of time about music will know that I'm not a lover of most pop-punk, I guess I just don't get it, something to do with <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">whiny</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">American</span> voices and simplistic song structures. Probably a direct result of me spending most of my late high school/college years listening almost exclusively to <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">prog</span>-rock.</div><br /><div>But I love these guys, and I'm really enthusiastic about working with them, especially as they seem so dead on and professional. Anyway, go to their <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">MySpace</span> and check out the cheerfully titled "And Hope To Die" and I'll keep you all posted on how the recording goes.</div><br /><div>I've got an excuse (as if I needed one) to re-do my website again, I'd link you to the old one but it's pretty god-<span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">awful</span>, as I need to write an essay and a presentation on marketing something for my Applied Content Distribution class, I figure I may as well do it on the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">wishy</span> washy topic of marketing myself as an audio engineer. So that should be coming along in the next few months as a hub for all of my online <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">presence</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">that's</span> currently scattered all over the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">interwebs</span>.</div><br /><div>Work's going pretty great. <a href="http://scotthumphries.info/">Scott</a> and I have now officially taken over as the in house audio engineers. It's lots of work, lots of fun, and I'm lots of grateful for this <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11">opportunity</span>. We've already had some truly awesome bands, artists, and comedy come to the venue, including Lethal <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12">Bizzle</span>, Dinosaur Pile Up, Bleach, The Pharaohs, Kid British, Little Boots, Pulled Apart By Horses, Chew Lips, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13">Ou</span> Est Le <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14">Swimming</span> Pool, Master <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15">Shortie</span>, Ebony Bones, King Blues and Flamboyant Bella to name but a few.</div><br /><div>Last night was a fantastic night, unfortunately left virtually <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16">punterless</span> due to G<a href="http://rockmusic.today.com/files/2009/03/the-bookhouse-boys.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 327px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 276px" alt="" src="http://rockmusic.today.com/files/2009/03/the-bookhouse-boys.jpg" border="0" /></a><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17">uy</span> Fawkes night. The openers <a href="http://www.myspace.com/wojtekgodzisz"><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18">Wojtek</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19">Godzisz</span></a> were awesome, totally the kind of music I've always been utterly in love with since high school. It was a mixture of <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20">grungy</span> sounds and more progressive arrangements and they were an utter joy to work with. I'd never listened to them except for a brief checking out session before the gig, but I would thoroughly <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21">recommend</span> people check them out if they come to a venue near you. <a href="http://www.myspace.com/thebookhouseboys">The <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22">Bookhouse</span> Boys</a> headlined and were also pretty spectacular. I've always had a thing for trumpets and <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23">weird</span> instruments, and this was my first encounter of an <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24">omnichord</span>. There were two lead singers, a woman and a man, the man sounded an <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25">awful</span> lot like Nick Cave, and the woman reminded me of Beth Gibbons (of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_26">Portishead</span> fame). They sounded pretty spectacular and I would thoroughly advise anyone who is into that kind of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_27">americana</span>/folk-rock to check them out.</div><br /><div>Stuff has calmed down a lot now, schedule wise and I'm gonna keep updating my blog more often, at least weekly, at least until stuff gets hectic. </div><br /><div></div>JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-76457570496462005292009-08-29T11:04:00.000+01:002009-08-29T12:05:39.390+01:00Augmented Reality and E-Book Readers.The thing that I lust after the most is shiny new gadgets. I love them but I can never afford them, and two things that I want but can't afford are an e-book reader, and a better phone.<br />The big new thing in mobile phones seems to be augmented reality. This is where by holding your GPS equipped device and aiming the camera at something, the device will overlay useful information. If you cant picture that picture the scene from Terminator where it cuts to his vision and says "Target: Sarah Connor" but then imagine when the terminator is on holiday and wants restaurant reviews "Target, dodgy Greek restaurant, Average rating: 1 star". Or you could get lost and point your camera phone at the street and be told where the nearest tube station is. The really great application that I heard discussed in Cnet UK was restaurant related again, How about ending up with some text in a foreign language in your hands, such as a menu, and holding your phone up to translate it. This really is the future and you can get it on your phone is you've got an iPhone or an Android based phone, but don't expect too much, it's no terminator vision yet, just some very clever tech. Get some more info over at <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/08/augmented-reality/">Wired</a>.<br />Another piece of clever tech but this time being done completely wrong is e-book readers. <a href="http://journal.davidbyrne.com/2009/08/082509-the-kindle-experience.html">David Byrne</a> talks about his experiences using the Kindle DX, explaining that it's a beautiful device (not that us Europeans would know, it being US based and everything) ruined by DRM. Now as far as I can tell, the only reason that book publishers think they can get away with crippling their users experience with DRM is that, unlike with music, you cant rip a book to your computer like you can a CD. You can scan it, but then it will be a crappy photocopied book. But as Byrne points out, the big rub is going to come when you buy a new e-book reader (such as the new Apple tablet perhaps) and you have to bu all your books again! Either that or you are locked in to Amazon's kindle range because they're the only ones that support this particular DRM.<br />The Sony readers are looking more enticing, as they support the more accepted if still DRMed e-pub format, and Google has announced that you can get all of its public domain books for free, as well as the <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/08/sony-endorses-google-books-settlement.html">option for institutions, libraries, and schools</a> to pay a subscription to get unlimited access to all of Google's books.<br />I assume what will really get people buying e-books is the same thing which made people decide that an iPod was good value for money- Piracy. Would you pay £100 for the opportunity not just to save some book shelf space, and save your back from lugging text books around, but also to never have to pay for a book again? I would bank on yes, and if this apple tablet becomes a success, then the stores that sell the books are no longer as closely linked to the devices, and they might just become a hit. Who knows, those people might just start paying for books again one day.JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-3147905832314070442009-08-26T12:57:00.000+01:002009-08-26T13:51:45.781+01:00How Much Longer Does Twitter Have?There is little argument that Twitter is expanding ever rapidly. It has come to the point now in fact where, according to a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIFYPQjYhv8">YouTube video</a>, Ashton Kutcher and Ellen DeGeneres have more Twitter followers than the entire population of Ireland, Norway and Panama. I am a moderate twitterer/ tweeter/ twit/twat or whatever the word is but I have never seen the point in following celebrities. Do people really want that kind of intimacy from some second rate actor or a chat show host? That said, just because they follow them doesn't mean that they ever come back, a massive proportion of Twitter's members tweet once then leave, perhaps they follow one of these people just before they leave? Or maybe people really do have more free time than I give them credit for.<br />But recently twitter doesn't seem to be holding up very well. Never have I seen a service with so many ways of fining out if it is down or not, and this can't just be down to the fact they they seem to be a <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/08/twitter-apparently-down/">target of DDoS attacks</a>, they just don't have the facilities to cope with the volume of traffic they receive at the moment. Then today I read about their <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/26/massive-twitter-security-problem-not-resolved-just-yet/">security problems,</a> where, for those of you who don't like to click links, simply receiving a tweet would allow someone to take over your account, TechCrunch's advice is to stay away for the next couple of days. The other big problem is the same problem that killed MySpace, that of spam. I'm sure that any people out there who use Twitter have noticed the ever increasing numbers of spammers, and it is really annoying.<br />The problem, as do so many, comes down to money. I'm sure they'd love to upgrade their servers, employ enough programmers that a problem like this can be patched in a couple of hours, and employ people to hunt out and delete spam accounts but they are slow to fix things and making no money and these things are not unrelated.<br />The thing is, people seem increasingly fed up with Facebook in a similar was to how people were fed up with MySpace, I hear more and more people talking about how fed up they are with facebook, and the logical next place to go is Twitter. But are they ready? Not yet.<br />Unless Twitter finds a business model soon, I think it will collapse as people move over to a different social network, or perhaps just back to Facebook.<br />An option that I liked that was being discussed on a CNet podcast, I forget whether it was Buzz out Loud or CNet UK, but the idea of opening up the protocol, in the same way the blogging is implemented. This way the load could be shared amongst all of the different providers. They pointed out that Twitter would not do this until they have worked out how they are going to monetize Twitter.<br />An option that I don't understand for monetizing twitter is the only option they seem to be discussing, that of keeping it free (right move) but charging for analysis tools and other professional tools. I know that people like dell make money <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/desktop/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=217801030">(reportedly $3 million)</a> by posting up special offers on twitter, direct to their biggest fans, but would Dell pay extra for extra tools? how would these tools help them sell more computers?<br />I'm not gonna pretend that I am any kind of expert on this, I just read a lot, and I know that social networks get replaced when the public gets fed up with them. And I like Twitter, I just hate the service.JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-43629568048994315152009-08-26T12:01:00.000+01:002009-08-26T12:38:28.379+01:00Bye Bye Big Brother.Today, Channel 4 confirmed that Big brother <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/aug/26/big-brother-dropped-channel-4">will not be returning for another year</a>. Now I'm pretty sure someone related to it had already said this. Now I am not a BB fan, or hater really but this made me really happy when I first heard it, disproportionately so in fact. A lot of people on the comment boards on the guardian article have been saying one of two things, either that Big Brother is responsible for the terrible TV we seem to have at the moment and that now finally T can get good again, or that Big Brother is responsible for the terrible TV we seem to have at the moment, but the fact that it has been on for ten years means that the damage has already been done.<br />Now obviously the guardian readership is not BB's target audience, but it has always surprised me how much negative feeling this show stirs up in people. When it first debuted onto our screens, I seem to remember it being heralded as ground breaking television, A psychological experiment that would be explained weekly by a top psychologist, explaining what being trapped in a house was doing to these people, and why it was happening. Eventually down the road the producers decided that it would be much more exciting if they filled the house with idiots that could be more easily manipulated, this I believe was probably their down fall, because people don't like to be irritated.<br />Along the way though, there were some truly great TV moments, we had Nasty Nick, the bizarre roller-coaster that was Jade Goody's celebrity life, we had a transgendered woman finally feeling like she had been accepted by the public, and the kind of romantic drama that you would expect from putting a bunch of young adults in a confined space.<br />Of course when a show receives massive viewing figures, it will be emulated and it did play a massive part in the reality TV that litters our screens today, some of which is terrible, some of which is fantastic (I'm looking at you dog the bounty hunter). At it's very core though, Big brother was just the next logical step from game shows (which is essentially what it is) and chat shows. People like to watch people, and you rarely get to see so much of anyone's life than you did in BB. People who look down their noses at people who enjoy this kind of television are snobs, and in this world of the internet, where viewing figures are plummeting, you will not be catered for, because there are not enough of you turning on the telly.<br />It was fascinating, entertaining, real, depressing, and a great dirty pleasure. It was the show that you had to watch to not be left out of your friend's conversations at school. It was pretty ground breaking TV that has been dragged through the mud for short term viewing figures and it should have stopped long ago.<br />But all the same, goodbye BB, thanks and good riddance.JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5231068799338785321.post-31983310359456796542009-08-25T13:43:00.000+01:002009-08-25T17:12:11.470+01:00A pretty eventful few days for pirates.Sometimes it seems like how ever many times people say it, the people at the top just don't understand that you can't put the genie back in the bottle.<br />Yesterday after a long struggle the pirate bay seems to have been taken down although for how long is a different matter <span style="font-style: italic;">[edit: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-returns-with-guns-blazing-090825/">it's back up</a>]</span>. I'm sure there was a ten minute dip in piracy as people found new torrent search engines. I noticed a lot of people desperate for Demonoid invites on Digg yesterday. And this is what happens every time of course, a fairly recent example of which was oink. I'm sure that closing oink down has had relatively no impact at all on it's users habits, as will TPB.<br />On a closely related note, I read in music week today that the idea of <a href="http://www.musicweek.com/story.asp?storycode=1038508">banning people from the internet</a> is being considered for cases of piracy (presumably focused on music piracy as all of this has come back into focus after Mandelson's talks with the head of Geffen the other day.) Now correct me if I'm wrong but did the European court of human rights not decide the last time this was being discussed that internet access in this modern age is a human right? The other ridiculous side of this idea that seems to be being batted around is fines as large as £50,000. Never mind the morallity of all of this, which countless people have talked about, have the majors seriously not learned from the PR disasters of the past? Suing your customers will not make them loyal to you, and your sure as hell can't sue them all.<br />Talking of retracing your own mistakes, another story I read in Music Week this morning was about the National Music Publishers Association (NMPA)<a href="http://www.musicweek.com/story.asp?storycode=1038515"> suing companies that publish song lyrics online</a>. Now note that getting lyrics for legitimately purchased songs online for free (the only price I would ever pay to read some lyrics) is not a service that as far as I know is even offered by the NMPA, or any of the people it represents.<br />This news today made me decide to start a blog because I need to write this stuff down or I may very likely explode with frustration.JCouperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12169803759305062213noreply@blogger.com0